我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 安全点亮
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 普布隆斯
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Models Assessing the Cost Effectiveness of Physiotherapy Interventions Post Total Knee and Hip Replacement

Ekta Shah

Background: Osteoarthritis is a primary cause of pain and disability, and it places a considerable economic burden on individuals and the society. In the management of total knee or hip replacement (TKHR), the long-term effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions may slowly accumulate over a period.

Objectives: To evaluate all the model-based cost-effectiveness (CE) of physiotherapy interventions for patients with (TKHR).

Study selection: Studies that assessed model-based CE of physiotherapy interventions following TKHR and were published in English language. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Philips Checklist criteria.

Data extraction/data synthesis: Two reviewers, using a predefined data extraction form, independently extracted data. A descriptive synthesis was used to present the results.

Results: Eight hundred eighty-six studies were identified, and the only 3 that met the inclusion criteria were included. Different model structures and assumptions were used in the included studies. The included studies were conducted in the United States of America (n = 1), Singapore (n = 1) and Italy (n = 1). The societal (n = 2) and healthcare (n = 1) perspective were adopted in the studies. The included studies reported an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $57,200 and 27,471 Singapore dollar (SGD) per quality-adjusted life years in a time horizon of lifetime and three months, respectively. Physiotherapy (hydrotherapy) interventions were potentially cost-effective.

Conclusion: Based on the best available evidence, the findings of this review suggest that physiotherapy interventions were CE and cost saving. However, it is important to note that among others the CE of the interventions was a function of the healthcare system, duration of interventions, patient compliance and price.