国际标准期刊号: 2161-0681

临床与实验病理学杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 期刊目录
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Accuracy of Combined Tru Cut and FNAC in Preoperative Sampling of Ovarian Tumors

Reham Naguib, Reda Hemida, Alaa Wageh, Mostafa Elkhiary, Ahmed Shabana, Waleed Elrefaey, Ibrahim Bahlool, Nadia Bassiony, Maha Mohamed Amin and Wageha Kandeel

Background: Preoperative histologic confirmation of malignant ovarian tumors before chemotherapy is mandatory. There are few reports about combined use of tru cut and FNAC as methods of preoperative sampling of ovarian tumors.
Patients and methods: This is a prospective study conducted on 50 female patients presented with advanced ovarian tumors, during the period between 1/6/2011 and 31/10/2013. Trans-abdominal ultrasound guided tru cut biopsy and FNAC were performed for the patients at the same setting. The results were compared with the postoperative histopathology reports which considered as the gold standard.
Results: Of the 50 tru cut procedures; 46 cases (92%) revealed diagnostic tissue and 4 specimens were rendered non representative. The diagnostic accuracy of tru cut biopsy is 95.7% with sensitivity is 94.7% and specificity 100%. The diagnostic accuracy of FNAC is 95% with sensitivity is 94.3% and specificity 100%. The Positive predictive value is 100% for both techniques. The negative predictive value for tru cut and FNAC is 80% and 71.4% respectively. When tru cut was combined with FNAC the rate of inadequate samples have fallen to 0. The diagnostic accuracy of combined tru cut and FNAC was 95.5% with sensitivity is 94.9% and specificity 100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 71.4%.
Conclusion: Both tru cut and FNAC are complementary to each other in achieving adequate samples for preoperative histologic diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Even if the diagnostic accuracy wasn't changed markedly, obtaining adequate samples can justify the beneficial combination of both techniques that will reduce the hazards and costs when a single technique has to be repeated to obtain sufficient tissues for diagnosis.