国际标准期刊号: 2161-0711

社区医学与健康教育

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 安全点亮
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Along with Humanity and Human Dignity, COVID-19 has Destroyed Medicine, Science, and Academia

Joel W. Hay

In 1998, when I named and founded what became the second most highly cited peer-reviewed economics journal, Value in Health, as Editor in Chief along with the other ISPOR Board of Directors, I had one overriding mission for the journal, “Tell the Truth.” In the past three decades, ISPOR became a vital and dynamic scientific organization precisely because it brought diverse clinical, economic, epidemiologic, statistical, psychological, and quality of life experts together from all over the globe, from a wide diversity of stakeholders, including academics, pharmaceutical and other biomedical companies, government agencies, non-profits, patients, providers, and payers. For the kinds of research reported in Value in Health it would have been very easy to fall into the trap that one’s science and research findings are automatically biased by one’s funding sources. This ad hominem approach to science is a convenient short cut that we are all somewhat guilty of, often subconsciously. For example, if all the authors on a paper are employees of a specific drug company, what are the chances that the paper concludes that the drug is worthless? We are more likely to read the paper skeptically than if all the authors work at an Ivy League university or non-profit research center. But we shouldn’t indulge that bias. We should be equally skeptical regardless of the source of funding and authorship.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证。