国际标准期刊号: 2155-6199

生物修复与生物降解杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • CAS 来源索引 (CASSI)
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 期刊目录
  • 研究圣经
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 访问全球在线农业研究 (AGORA)
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 米亚尔
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Biodegradation of plastics

Khaled Mohamed

Plastic pollution of marine and terrestrial environments has sparked debate about the possibility of utilising biodegradable polymers instead of traditional, nonbiodegradable plastics to reduce pollution. While we find these conversations to be beneficial and forward-thinking, we have seen that a number of recently published pieces have failed to fully acknowledge the foundation. These articles are divided into two groups. The first group includes articles that purport to evaluate plastic biodegradation but fail to include the necessary experimental data (i.e., data on microbial assimilation of plastic carbon). The biodegradability of certified biodegradable plastics is questioned in publications in the second category, based on discoveries of insufficient biodegradation polymers. Based on insufficient biodegradation of these plastics in conditions other than those for which they were certified biodegradable we are afraid that such publications, especially when they receive a lot of media attention, would misdirect the entire discussion about the role of biodegradable plastics in reducing plastic pollution, leading to misunderstandings and, eventually, adversity.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证。