国际标准期刊号: ISSN 2472-016X

骨科肿瘤学杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

抽象的

Case Report: Acute Calcific Tendonitis at the Pectoralis Major Attachment-A Benign Cause of Red Flag Signs

Christian Gray Stephens, Boyd Goldie and Asif Saifuddin

Introduction: Acute calcific tendonitis at the pectoralis major insertion is rarely reported in the radiology literature, but not in the Orthopaedic literature. We present a case that illustrates the typical findings with discussion from a shoulder surgeon, and a senior radiologist.

Case Study: A 60-year-old woman was woken at night with sudden onset left shoulder and arm pain. She was otherwise systemically well. Her shoulder range of motion was globally restricted. Past medical history included previous spinal surgery and a hepatitis A infection within the last year.

Plain radiographs of the shoulder and humerus were unremarkable save for a small an anterior proximal humeral protuberance at the junction of proximal third and distal two-thirds of the humeral shaft. Blood tests were unremarkable. CT and MRI imaging showed a calcific tendon with associated cortical defect, and surrounding inflammation.

Because of the sinister red flag symptoms (night pain) and suggestion of cortical erosion with periosteal reaction, the differential diagnosis list included sarcoma. For this reason, it was referred to the local sarcoma service. This was reviewed by a senior radiologist. The diagnosis of calcific tendonitis of pectoralis major calcific tendonitis was made. The decision was made by the Sarcoma MDT to not biopsy the lesion but instead review clinically with interval scan and safety netting.

On six week clinic follow up the patient’s symptoms had improved. Because of the knowledge regarding this potential diagnosis, unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures (CT biopsy) or surgeries were avoided. Repeat MRI at three month showed resolution of changes.

Conclusion: Both Orthopaedic surgeons within sarcoma services and wider members of the multidisciplinary team should be aware of this diagnosis. This would help to prevent over investigation of benign self-limiting pathologies.