我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

抽象的

Classification of neonatal medication errors using a validated, standardised tool

Natalie Gallagher

Medication errors (MEs) are common in neonates and have the potential to cause significant harm in a vulnerable population. Previous studies have categorised the seriousness of MEs in purely subjective terms. The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) Index is a validated standardised tool for categorising MEs according to the severity of the outcome but there are limited data on its use in neonates. We describe the use of the MERP Index to categorise MEs in neonates. MEs reported to an online system in a level 3 NICU over a 12-month period were reviewed. The severity of the error was assessed using the MERP Index containing 9 categories of severity. Information on patient demographics and the type of ME was also collected. 337 MEs were identified in 167 infants with a median (IQR) gestational age of 28 (25-33) weeks, birthweight of 1005 (745-2244) g and age 14 (2-37) days. The most common type of MEs were prescription (181) and administration errors (119). Categorisation of errors using the MERP Index showed that the majority of MEs did not reach the patient (222/337). 65 were errors that reached the patient but did not cause harm and 15 required further intervention to prevent harm. There were no errors that resulted in harm or death. In conclusion, although MEs are common in neonates, the vast majority are of no clinical significance. The MERP Index allows systematic, objective categorization of errors and can be used effectively in a neonatal population

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证。