国际标准期刊号: 2157-7625

生态系统与生态学杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • CAS 来源索引 (CASSI)
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • 在线访问环境研究 (OARE)
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 访问全球在线农业研究 (AGORA)
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
分享此页面

抽象的

Conservation Challenges of Omo National Park from National Park Governance and Management Perspectives in South Omo Zone, Ethiopia

David Inada

A key component of international conservation strategy is the creation of protected areas. Ethiopia is one of the countries from east Africa which recognized protected area to conserve its unique fauna and flora. The country includes a wide range of ecosystems, including semi-arid, open grassland steppe, and arid desert, all of which have a high potential for biodiversity and endemism. To protect its unique species, Ethiopia created a number of national parks, sanctuaries, wildlife reserves, and restricted hunting areas. The main issues facing protected areas in the country, however, are a lack of clear national and international policies, a lack of commitment from national park governance, a lack of funding, and the need for education to increase public awareness. As a result, this study’s focus was on the conservation challenges facing Ethiopia’s Omo National Park from the perspectives of governance and management. In this regard, the park management officers and wardens in the south omo zone Jinka town provided the primary data. Several written materials from the official records of Omo National Park also provided some secondary data. Omo National Park is managed by the Southern Nations, Nationalities and People’s Regional State Culture and Tourism Bureau Hawassa, according to informants and review findings from EUCAbased sources. The Park has a management staff and a security team, in the respondents’ opinion. The security staff may have the ability to make decisions regarding park-related matters, and they have the responsibility and power to oversee the management structures. The national park is largely invaded by local pastoralists with a large number of cows, and the local inhabitants hunt extensively inside the park. South Sudanese Murule tribes and even the park security personnel engage in illicit hunting. Only the influences of the park’s security teams and park wardens are visible when looking closely at the park. Lack of effective low enforcement has caused a huge extinction of elephants as a result of unauthorized labor taken up by both locals and visitors. The major causes of conflict between ethnic pastoralists and wildlife in the Omo National Park area are a lack of clearly defined boundaries and locally based wildlife lows. As a result, the park’s potential ecological quality and diversity are currently declining, so that urgent conservation efforts as well as suitable management and governance measures highly needed.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证。