国际标准期刊号: 2329-6879

职业医学与健康事务

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • 学术钥匙
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Did I Always Have a Hole in My Glove? Prevalence and Reporting Practice of Needle Stick Injuries amongst Healthcare Workers in District Hospital

Jerocin Vishani Loyala, Bisma Hussain, Gaurav Pydisetty, Athena Michaelides, Melina Mahr

Background: Needle stick injuries (NSI) carry the risk of transmitting blood-borne viruses. Changes in legislation have led to the use of safer instruments, mandatory training and outlined protocol to follow in the event of an NSI. Despite such efforts to minimize the occurrence, the number of NSIs remains at large.

Methods: Data was collected via an anonymous online retrospective survey over two months. This a single center studies in a UK district hospital.

Results: From 438 healthcare workers, 69 responses were collected. Data identified one third (n=23) of respondents had experienced at least one NSI while working at the Hospital. 42.88% (n=9) did not report at least one of their sustained NSI quoting reasons such as paperwork, perceived low transmission risk and NSI stigma. Surgical consultants, medical consultants and nurses experienced the highest number of NSIs respectively. Also, female staffs were ten times more likely to report NSIs compared to male staff.

Discussion: Familiarity with Hospital policy can be linked to an increased likelihood of reporting; staff who did report was the most familiar with the policy. However, familiarity did not ensure consistent reporting on all occasions. Out of 54, only 18.52% (n=10) of respondents mentioned the correct first aid measure. These, along with other staff suggestions, are areas that need improvement. Related stigma could explain avoidance towards reporting, as protocol requires lengthy paperwork and involvement of other staff. Surgical specialties remain mainly at risk for NSIs and worth further investigation.

Conclusion: Findings concluded prominent under-reporting and various similarities with existing literature. Policies need to be more transparent and easily accessible to staff. Better reporting practice will lead to the identification and implementation of improved safety measures.