国际标准期刊号: 1522-4821

国际紧急心理健康和人类复原力杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 引用因子
  • 西马戈
  • 大英图书馆
  • 斯科普斯
  • 参考搜索
  • 普布隆斯
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 出版医学
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Does The Timetable Of Public Assistance Payments Affect Visits At The Psychiatric Emergency Room?

Adam Noy MD, Daniel Moadel MD

Introduction: Many psychiatric patients in urban areas of the US receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI). It is conceivable that depletion of funds triggers for some patients a visit to emergency room (ER). If this was the case, it could be expected to register an increase numbers of visits of SSI recipients towards the end of the payment cycle. If this is not the case, the suspicion that admission to the hospital might also provide a secondary gain, should be remove as a consideration, so that patients can receive an unbiased assessment. Methods: Charts of patient’s visits at the psychiatric ER of Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia were reviewed. The relationship between the number of days after receiving the benefits payment and time of presentation to the ER was analyzed. Homelessness status and the presence of a positive drug test were also considered. Results: 274/1007 of patients who visited the ER visits during 2018 were recipients of SSI. No relationship was found between visit time and days elapsed since last benefits check. The interval between receiving benefits and visiting the ER had no relationship to homelessness status (p=0.9271) or the presence of a positive drug screen (p=0.0752) Conclusion: There was no increase in ER visits at the end of the payment cycle to suggest that exhausted funds played a role, either as a psychosocial stressor or as a motivation for the secondary gain. Despite the limitations of this study, denying admission to a patient based on suspicions of secondary gains should be reconsider