国际标准期刊号: ISSN:2167-7964

放射学组学杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 研究圣经
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Effects of a Cesarean Scar on the Flow Resistance of the Uterine Artery: Doppler Ultrasonography Performance

Arzu Turan, Fatma Beyazal ÇELİKER, Neşe ÇÖLÇİMEN, Ülkü Mete Ural, Mehmet Fatih İnecikli and Gülşah Balık

Purpose: Assessment of the uterine artery is becoming increasingly important in the prediction of early preeclampsia and a low birth weight. Incidents of caesarean section are gradually increasing, and it is mentioned that caesarean scar increases resistance of the uterine artery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a caesarean scar on resistance of the uterine artery.

Methods: Prospectively, a totally of 498 pregnant women were evaluated. The average of the last menstrual period of the participating pregnant women was calculated as 21 w 1, and the average age was 29.6 (±5.5). Uterine artery doppler USG examination was conducted on 250 pregnant women (one or more caesarean sections), and a control group consisted of 248 pregnant women (non-caesarean scar). The UtA-RI and UtA-PI values of the uterine artery were measured on the doppler USG examination and statistical analysis was performed.

Results: IBM SPSS (for Windows version 24) statistical software, ROC analysis, and student’s (independent) ttest methods were used for in the statistical evaluation of this study. There was no statistically significant difference between groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion: This study assessed the effects of a caesarean scar on the resistance of the uterine artery on the doppler USG examination. No statistically significant difference was observed in the UtA-RI and UtA-PI values, and only 1.9-3.5% of the variability in the UtA-RI and UtA-PI values, based on the obtained effect size, could be explained by an effect of the C/S scar.