国际标准期刊号: 2165-7904

肥胖与减肥治疗杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 国际农业与生物科学中心 (CABI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • SWB 在线目录
  • CABI 全文
  • 出租车直达
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 布里斯托大学
  • 出版医学
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Efficacy of Intragastric Balloons for the Treatment of Obesity-a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Musthafa Chalikandy Peedikayil, Zenusha Edathodu, Saud A Khan, Reham Sindi, Fahad Alsohaibani, Devol Edward Bentz

Background: Intragstric balloons (IGB) are space-occupying devices that are inserted endoscopically into the stomach and removed after approximately 6 months for the treatment of obesity. IGBs are associated with short-term weight loss while having the advantage of preserving the normal anatomy of the stomach. The long-term efficacy of IGB on weight loss is still questioned. .

Objectives: To determine the short- and long-term efficacy of IGB for the treatment of obesity.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the weight changes and BMI changes in patients who underwent an IGB procedure for obesity treatment was conducted. Articles that reported the mean and standard deviation of BMI and weight, and the number of patients before IGB insertion and at the time of IGB removal were selected. The shortterm outcomes were assessed from the IGB insertion to its removal. The Long-term outcomes were assessed from six months and beyond from removal of the IGB. The comprehensive literature search was performed using search engines, PubMed, and other sources. The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Guidelines and protocols as per the "PRISMA guidelines" were adhered to during the systematic review and meta-analysis.

Results: A total of 27 articles were reviewed for the systematic review. The total number of patients at the time of IGB insertion was 4400. The short-term treatment effect of the IGB on obesity was assessed by meta-analysis of 15 articles. The observed standardized mean differences ranged from 0.2949 to 1.5596, with most estimates being positive (100%). The estimated average standardized mean difference based on the random-effects model was 0.7540 (95% CI: 0.5546 to 0.9535). Therefore, the average outcome differed significantly from zero (z = 7.4106, p < 0.0001).

A total of six studies were included in the analysis to assess the long-term effect of IGB treatment on obesity. The observed standardized mean differences ranged from -0.3239 to 0.0000, with most estimates being negative (83%). The estimated average standardized mean difference based on the random-effects model was -0.0961 (95% CI: -0.2113 to 0.0190). Therefore, the average outcome did not differ significantly from zero (z = -1.6364, p = 0.1018).

Conclusion: Intragastric balloons are effective in the treatment of obesity in the short-term. The meta-analysis did not show a beneficial effect on the treatment of obesity after removal.