国际标准期刊号: 2329-6879

职业医学与健康事务

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • 学术钥匙
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Efficacy of the Bobath Concept in Improving Performance in Activities of Daily Living in Patients after Stroke: A Literature Review

Eirini Kolliopoulou

Despite its long background, since the 1940s, and its wide use, there are few studies regarding the results of Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT) in stroke patients. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of the Bobath concept in the functionality and independence in activities and the use of upper limb compared to the usual treatment in the neurological rehabilitation after stroke. Design: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials, controlled trials, pilot studies, quasi-experimental studies and previous systematic reviews. Population: Adults after stroke. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the literature on the Bobath concept from the first available publication in 2012 until December of 2022 was performed, consulting Pubmed, PEDro, Epistemonikos, CercaTot UVic, Sciencedirect and Cochrane Library databases. PEDro scale was used to determine methodological quality. Intervention: Treatment based on the Bobath concept compared to other or no interventions. Outcomes: Activities of Daily Living and upper limb motor activity. Results: Nine clinical trials and two systematic reviews were included; all but two studies compared the Bobath concept with another intervention. PEDro scale scores ranged from 3 to 7. There is limited evidence of the superiority of Bobath over other interventions, especially amplitude exercises and stretching, in producing significant changes in upper limb activity. Therapy based on Bobath concept is less effective than robotics and task-oriented training. The superiority of Bobath concept or any other therapeutic approach cannot be concluded regarding Activities of Daily Living and quality of life of stroke patients. Conclusions: No solid documentation was found describing the superiority of neurodevelopmental treatment, nor of any other advanced intervention, to consider it recommended for the improvement of functionality and quality of life after stroke. Methodological aspects of the selected studies are presented for future research. It is strongly recommended that future clinical trials analyze the functional benefits of the Bobath concept.