国际标准期刊号: 2161-1165

Epidemiology: Open Access

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 安全点亮
  • 访问全球在线农业研究 (AGORA)
  • 国际农业与生物科学中心 (CABI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • CABI 全文
  • 出租车直达
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Epidemiology, Public Health: Review of Regression Discontinuity

James Till

A rigorous quasi-experimental technique for evaluating the causal effects of interventions on outcomes is regression discontinuity (RD) designs. RD can be used to estimate the causal effect of the treatment on health and other outcomes whenever a decision rule as- signs treatment, such as antihypertensive or antiretroviral therapies, to patients who score higher (or lower) than a specific cutoff value on a continuously measured variable, such as blood pressure or CD4 count. Similar to randomization, RD can address issues with confounding caused by unobserved factors and produce estimates of a treatment's causal effects that are free from bias. Due to the prevalence of treatments assigned using a cutoff rule, RD is a particularly helpful study design for medicine, epidemiology, and public health. Statins are prescribed by doctors using blood pressure cutoffs to decide how to manage hypertension, using mole size cutoffs as guidelines for mole removal, and recommending surgery for scoliosis when spinal curvature surpasses a specific threshold of severity. Additionally, RD possesses desirable practical traits. It may not be possible to conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) when a treatment has already become the norm, but RD can provide robust causal evidence on treatment efficacy when there is scant or no experimental evidence or when the evidence that is available has dubious internal or external validity.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证。