国际标准期刊号: 2165-7904

肥胖与减肥治疗杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 国际农业与生物科学中心 (CABI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • SWB 在线目录
  • CABI 全文
  • 出租车直达
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 布里斯托大学
  • 出版医学
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Estimation of Body Fat Mass (in%) as a Measure of Obesity among UG Medical Students and its Correlation with Clinical Markers of Obesity (BMI)

Abhishek Ghose

Background & objectives: This study was conducted to assess the burden of overweight and obesity among UG medical students by measurement of body fat mass percentage (BF%) and to evaluate the validity of BF% as a clinical marker of obesity by its correlation with BMI.

Methods: The research was conducted as a cross sectional, observational study using the principle of Bioelectric Impedance Analysis for measurement of body fat

Results: There were 237 males (55.5%) and 187 females (44.5%) among the study participants. The burden of overweight and obesity among the students was found to be 26% and 9.8% respectively according to WHO global BMI criteria whereas it was 18.8% and 35.7% respectively, if the Asian criterion was used. This abnormality was pervasive across all the four years of UG MBBS students. The startling finding is that students who were labeled as ‘Normal’ using the BMI criterion were found to be obese by BF% assessment (43%) and even ‘Underweight’ students were found to have more than normal levels of BF% (15.2%). Measurement of waist circumference (WC) showed that 146 (34.8%) of the students had WC higher than normal. Likewise, 145 (34.5%) of the students had Waist-Hip Ratio higher than normal. Abnormalities of all above parameters put the students at risk of NCDs.

Conclusion: The study shows a high burden of overweight and obesity in medical students. Using body fat percentage as a clinical marker of adiposity is more desirable than using BMI only to screen clinical obesity.