我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Evaluating End-of-life and Medical Assistance in Dying Communication Learning - A Literature Review

Konia Trouton, Jolanta Vaitekonyte, Brittany Clark

Aim: Our literature review assesses the available End of Life (EOL) and Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) communication training for clinicians and trainees. By analyzing training program evaluations, we assess their impact to learners’ practice and improvements to patient care. We then highlight the effective training programs, which could be considered to support further development of continuing education curriculum for EOL and MAiD discussions.

Background: Healthcare providers are facing an ongoing need for education in EOL communication with patients and families to support patient-centered care. Since legalization of MAiD in 2016 in Canada, number of patients seeking this option is growing. Currently, there is no widely accessible, standardized EOL or MAiD discussion curriculum to support clinicians of diverse experience levels. While jurisdiction or profession-specific training is available to some providers, it is unclear whether it translates to improvements in their practice or patient care.

Methods: We conducted a peer-reviewed and grey literature search on the topics of EOL, palliative care and MAiD-related training for healthcare providers and trainees. We targeted resources published between June 1, 2011 and June 1, 2021, in English language, worldwide. Using rapid review protocol, initial search of 9284 titles was shortlisted to 104 training programs offering training on EOL discussions with adult patients and their families. Using CRe-DEPTH framework our team evaluated the reported impact of the training.

Results: Limited scope of evaluations of most training programs posed challenges to determine their longer-term benefits to practitioners and patients, or to define which teaching approaches were the most impactful. Interdisciplinary learning helped to validate the results of some training programs, suggesting benefits of the approach in teaching EOL/MAiD discussion curricula. Despite the challenges, many great training programs emerged from the field that could serve as starting points to build high quality EOL and MAiD communications training.