我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • 打开 J 门
  • 学术钥匙
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis

Maximilian Hench and Gernot Seppel

Background: Plantar fasciitis is a common pain syndrome of the foot associated with severe discomfort and often results in the patient’s limitation. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a widely used treatment
option which offers an alternative to other conventional methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ESWT in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Material and methods: Thirty-two participants were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blinded study. All participants were randomized into two groups. Therapy group received 3 sessions of focused ESWT in a weekly interval. Control group received placebo intervention with the same frequency. Outcomes of the follow-up were taken after the last treatment session and again in a 3-month follow-up. Evaluation of the treatment was achieved with the Visual Analog Scal (VAS) and Roles and Maudsley score.
Results: Treatment with ESWT provided superior results in evaluation with (VAS) and also with Roles and Maudsley score when compared with the placebo treatment. Decrease of pain in the first few steps in the morning was 29.9% after the last therapy and 63.2% in the 3-month follow-up in the therapy group. In the control group the decrease was 11% and 23.7% respectively. Decrease of pain in the normal daily activities was 29.0% after the last therapy and 63.0% in the 3-month follow-up. In the control group the decrease was 8.7% and 24.3% respectively. Satisfaction with the therapy results measured by Roles and Maudsley score improved by 28.1% after the last treatment and by 46.9% in the 3-month follow-up in the therapy group. In the control group the improvement was 6.3% and 18.8% respectively.
Discussion:  Although the biologic effects of ESWT are not yet fully understood, the clinical evidence of its efficiency is being proved in a growing number of studies. It is not surprising that for this reason, ESWT is often
being compared to other treatment approaches such as corticosteroid injections. Another frequently discussed topic regarding the use of the ESWT in plantar fasciitis is the possible time-dependent cumulative effect.
Conclusion: Focused ESWT is an effective modality in the treatment of patients suffering from chronic plantar fasciitis in both short and long period.