我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • 打开 J 门
  • 学术钥匙
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 学者指导
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 卡迪夫大学
分享此页面

抽象的

Marine Mammals are in Danger due to Global Warming

Demon Anderson

Marine mammals have come to symbolise the dangers of global warming as a result of the major changes in Northern sea ice regimes caused by climate change. There is a conflict between adopting flexible, adaptable regulations that are likely to succeed in Northern locations and policies that have worldwide backing, such as a ban on seal or whaling hunts. This analysis concentrates on the "human dimensions" of Northern marine mammal management as opposed to the "biological dimensions" that are the subject of most wildlife policy that serve to inform policy strategy. The success of conservation is examined in connection to how people interact with one another and how governments operate. Standard evaluations of animal population danger that concentrate on direct sources of take are insufficient to address multi-cause, complex issues like habitat loss brought on by climate change or rising industrialization of the Arctic Ocean. Early conservation policy solutions focusing on the moratorium of take have eliminated or reduced such behaviours as commercialised hunting and large levels of fisheries bycatch, but they may be less applicable today as habitats and climate change become important factors in population dynamics. This essay makes the case for the need for innovative approaches to understanding and regulating interactions between people and marine mammals. The paper analyses the degree to which marine mammal management regimes in three Northern regions—Alaska, Nunavut, and the Finnish Baltic Sea coast—practice adaptive governance, that is, fostering cross-scale (local to international) understanding while giving local actors the freedom to direct the development of regulations that are ecologically sound and likely to be successful. We draw lessons from these cases and use them to suggest specific research and policy suggestions for the marine mammal policy community.