国际标准期刊号: 2572-0899

全球护理与法医学研究杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

抽象的

Mutual benefits in academic-service partnership: An integrative review

Maliheh Sadeghnezhad1, Fatemeh Heshmati Nabavi1, Fereshteh Najafi2 and Hossein Kareshki3 and Habibollah Esmaily1

Academic and service institutions involve with many challenges. Partnership programs are golden opportunity to achieve mutual benefits to overcome these challenges. Identifying mutual benefits is the cornerstone of forming successful partnership and guarantee to its continuity. There are definitions and instances of mutual benefits in the literature related to partnership programs, but there is no coherent evidence and clear picture of these benefits. This study is conducted to identify mutual benefits in academic-service partnership by analyzing the definitions and instances of it in the literature. An integrative review of key papers regarding mutual benefits in academic-service partnership was undertaken. Search of the following databases was conducted: MEDLINE, ERIC, Google Scholar, Emerald Insight and Science Direct. Search terms include mutual benefits, mutual gains, mutual interest, mutual expectations, mutual goals, mutual demand, partnership, collaboration, academic-service partnership and academic service collaboration. Cooper’s five-stage integrative review method was used. Quality evaluation of articles was conducted. The analysis was conducted based on the qualitative content analysis of the literature suggested by Zhang and Wildemuth. 28 articles were included in this review. Mutual benefits are described in four categories include: synergy in training and empowerment of human resources, education improvement, access to shared resources, facilitate production and application of beneficial knowledge into practice. Mutual benefits in the academic-service partnership include a range of goals, interests, expectations, and needs of partner organizations that is achievable and measurable through joint planning and collaboration. We suggest academic and service policy makers consider these benefits in the planning and evaluating partnership program.

 

Keywords: Academic-service partnership; Integrative review; Mutual benefits; Partnership.

 

The point of our deliberate audit was to recover and incorporate applicable proof identified with the cycle of arrangement and execution of the scholastic assistance organization, fully intent on transforming the clinical schooling program. Notwithstanding a plenty of examination proof about executing the scholarly assistance association, nobody to date has attempted a vigorous methodical survey about its cycle. An electronic hunt was performed to recognize distributed examinations somewhere in the range of 1995 and 2008. Search procedures adjusted from the University of York's Center for Reviews and Dissemination were utilized. Fifteen papers were acknowledged dependent on the consideration rules and evaluated for quality. Information were summed up specifically. Four fundamental stages arose: Mutual Potential Benefits, Moving From Being Competitors to Collaborators, Joint Practice, and Beneficial Outcomes. This present investigation's discoveries can give reasonable rules to guide association programs inside the scholarly and clinical bodies, determined to give a synergistic organization way to deal with clinical training.

 

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证。