国际标准期刊号: 2157-7625

生态系统与生态学杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • CAS 来源索引 (CASSI)
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • 在线访问环境研究 (OARE)
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 访问全球在线农业研究 (AGORA)
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
分享此页面

抽象的

Providing an Analytical Framework for Assessing the Impact of Biodiversity Objectives at the Strategic and Project Levels

Bernard James

Human evolution puts a strain on biodiversity, which is why the Convention on Biological Diversity, among other international policies, protects it. Impact assessment (IA) instruments are regarded as a valuable tool for assisting in the protection of biodiversity at various levels of decision making, but they are argued to work independently at the policy and plan levels (Strategic Environmental Assessment, SEA) as opposed to the project level (Environmental Impact Assessment, EIA), creating inefficiencies in knowledge transfer that endangers biodiversity protection. The purpose of this paper is to compare biodiversity coverage in SEA and EIA literature in order to better understand the potential for transferring biodiversity knowledge from SEA to EIA (known as tiring).

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证。