国际标准期刊号: 2157-7617

地球科学与气候变化杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • CAS 来源索引 (CASSI)
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • 在线访问环境研究 (OARE)
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 期刊目录
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 访问全球在线农业研究 (AGORA)
  • 国际农业与生物科学中心 (CABI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 普罗奎斯特传票
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 普布隆斯
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Statistical Evaluation of CORDEX Regional Climate Model?s Performances in Simulating Climate Variables at Upper Awash Basin, Case Study of Akaki Catchment

Bekan Chelkeba Tumsa

The main focus of this study was to investigate and evaluate the Performance of Four Regional Climate Models irrespective of their capability in simulating mean precipitation and Temperature. In this fact and concern, the evaluation of those climate models was basically on how they simulate mean annual climatology, annual cycle and inter annual variability of precipitation, maximum and minimum temperature over the entire catchment. All observed data that used for performance evaluation from 1980-2006 was obtained from Ethiopian National Meteorological Agency and RCM data was extracted from CORDEX-Africa-44 using grid points. RCM show significant bias and almost all of them simulate those climate variables’ at different levels. In the analysis of annual cycle of precipitation during summer season all RCM was underestimated. However, RACMO22T and RCA4 show better adjustment at simulation of both precipitation and Temperatures despite of their significant bias. The bias was deliberately associated with higher error in simulating maximum and minimum temperature at highest topography found at sebeta and Addis Ababa catchments. The interannual variability of precipitations and temperature was shown great evidence where the region is under the impact of climate change specifically when the trend of annual projected temperature shown incremental modality. As far as concern the mean climatology analysis by statistical parameters, almost all models perform nearly equal excluding the seasonal point of view in which RCMs were perform quit differently during season analysis. In all aspects and evidence by statistically evaluated output realize that, RACMO22T and RCA4 were better performed at upper awash catchments although some of their bias and uncertainty were available. Generally, the performance of Regional climate models was different at different catchment along with the specified locations and topographies. Furthermore, the seasonal analysis over Akaki catchment clearly indicates that climate models were more capable of simulate wet season than dry.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证。