国际标准期刊号: 2165-7904

肥胖与减肥治疗杂志

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 国际农业与生物科学中心 (CABI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • SWB 在线目录
  • CABI 全文
  • 出租车直达
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 布里斯托大学
  • 出版医学
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

The 100 Most Influential Manuscripts in Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: A Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis

Dominic Thompson, Bedanta Baruah, Jonathan Barry

Background: Bibliometric analysis identifies the most cited publications, which define understanding of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB). In this study, the 100 most cited articles in the field of LAGB were studied and correlation between Total Citation Count (TCC), Citation Rate Index (CRI), Level of Evidence (LOE), and Altmetric Attention Scores (AAS) analysed.

Methods: The Thomson Reuters Web of Science database was used to identify relevant English language articles using the search terms: ((laparo* and adjust* and gastr* and band*) OR (LAGB or L.A.G.B.)) AND ALL FIELDS: ((endoscop* or remov* or complicat*)). The 100 most cited papers analysed.

Results: 1,473 articles were returned with median citation count of 122 [interquartile range (IQR):96.75–215.25]. The most cited article was ‘Surgical Treatment of Obesity’ by Maggard et al. (962 citations). The journal “Obesity Surgery” published the most papers within the top 100 and had the highest TCC (n=36, 5633 citations). The article with the highest AAS. LOE was significantly related to TCC (p=0.0029), CRI (p=0.00002) and AAS (p=0.00173). Articles published post-2006 had a higher AAS compared to pre-2006 (p=0.00001). The AAS of articles published pre-2006 were not correlated with the TCC (r=0.2332, p=0.1108) but had a positive correlation with the CRI (r=0.3194, p=0.0268). The AAS post-2006 did not have a significant correlation with TCC (r=0.5274, p=5.8596) or CRI (r=0.5274, p=5.8596).

Conclusion: Bibliometric indices provide an important perspective on article impact and are related to evidence level. AAS and, consequently, social media impact is now a valid measurement of academic impact.