国际标准期刊号: 2161-0711

社区医学与健康教育

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 安全点亮
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

The Automated Blood Count: Its History, Utility and Need for Change

Srdjan Denic, Abdul Kader Souid and M Gary Nicholls

An automated complete blood cell count (CBC) is one of the most frequently ordered laboratory tests. The clinical utility of its 20 to 25 parameters, however, is variable depending, for example, upon the physician’s age, education and specialty. Likewise, the information value of some CBC indices differs in populations with, for example, a high prevalence of benign (ethnic) neutropenia or thalassemia trait compared with other populations. Whereas modern blood cell analyzers count reticulocytes they do not include this important count in a ‘standard’ CBC report. In this article, we review the history of blood cell counting, the clinical utility of some parameters as well as the logic and information processing costs of their use in clinical practice. We conclude that the CBC as currently reported is an unnecessarily complex yet incomplete test, and suggest that blood analyzers be reprogramed to offer physicians a Short CBC with 11 clinically relevant parameters i.e. red cell count, reticulocyte count, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, red blood cell distribution width, platelet count, and five absolute leukocyte differential counts.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证。