国际标准期刊号: 2161-0711

社区医学与健康教育

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 安全点亮
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

The Main Themes and Experiences Shared with the Hashtag #BlackintheIvory: A Qualitative Analysis

Mopileola Tomi Adewumi, Paul Delgado, Marvin Carr, Emily Sowah, Matt Vassar

Background: The movement #BlackintheIvory gave Black academics an opportunity to connect through social media, sharing common experiences while pursuing higher education. Through analyzing Twitter posts, using the hashtag #BlackintheIvory, this study investigates the main themes identified among Black scholars in academia and their shared experiences with teaching, mentoring, collegiality, identity, service, and racism.

Method: Using the Twitter API, we isolated publicly available tweets, which can include text, images, and links to websites, posted with #BlackintheIvory on the Twitter website (www.twitter.com) from the inception of #BlackintheIvory in June 2020 to the end of December 2020. To evaluate the tweets, we categorized tweets inductively. Based on the content of posts, we identified 6 themes: Teaching, Mentoring, Collegiality, Identity, Service, and Racism.

Result: Our search yielded a total of 12,538 original posts, including tweets between inception in June 2020 to December 2020 from profiles made public (excluding modified and duplicate tweets). We selected and analyzed the top retweeted 2500 tweets, which is 20% (2500/12538) of the total number of downloaded tweets. The greatest percentage of posts was Teaching (881; 35%), Service (441; 18%) and Racism (414; 17%). The remaining tweets were categorized as Collegiality (388; 15%), Identity (210; 8%), and Mentoring (166; 7%) of the total number of tweets from June-December 2020.

Conclusion: The experiences, perspectives, and narratives among the Black diaspora within #BlackintheIvory are not uniform. The commonality exists within the structural systemic racism which impacts Black academics within the ivory tower; this study is a resounding wake up call for action.