English 
Spanish 
Russian 
German 
French 
Japanese 
Portuguese 
Hindi 我们集团组织了 3000 多个全çƒç³»åˆ—会议 æ¯å¹´åœ¨ç¾Žå›½ã€æ¬§æ´²å’Œç¾Žå›½ä¸¾åŠžçš„活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科å¦åä¼šçš„æ”¯æŒ å¹¶å‡ºç‰ˆäº† 700+ 开放获å–期刊包å«è¶…过50000å知å人士ã€çŸ¥å科å¦å®¶æ‹…任编委会æˆå‘˜ã€‚
开放获å–期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 ç§æœŸåˆŠ å’Œ 15,000,000 å读者 æ¯ä»½æœŸåˆŠ 获得 25,000 多å读者
索引于
- 哥白尼索引
- è°·æŒå¦æœ¯
- å¤å°”å·´·ç½—密欧
- 打开 J 门
- Genamics 期刊æœç´¢
- å‚考æœç´¢
- 哈姆达大å¦
- 亚利桑那州EBSCO
- OCLC-世界猫
- 普布隆斯
有用的链接
开放获å–期刊
分享æ¤é¡µé¢
抽象的
The Right of Privacy: A Reflection on Warren and Brandeisâ?? Interpretation and the Case of Ethiopia 1991-2018.
Tadesse Biru Kersmo
The Right to Privacy is a form of negative liberty that ensures people to enjoy life without unlawful interference from the state or other agents. Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis are the two forerunner activists on the Right to Privacy. Although some of their propositions are debatable, their insight in the Right to Privacy is still valid. This article tries to reflect on Warren and Brandeis’ contribution to concept of the “Right to Privacy” and its practical application in the contemporary world taking Ethiopia as a case study.