国际标准期刊号: 2161-1165

Epidemiology: Open Access

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴·罗密欧
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 安全点亮
  • 访问全球在线农业研究 (AGORA)
  • 国际农业与生物科学中心 (CABI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • CABI 全文
  • 出租车直达
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

Validation of Each Category of Kihon Checklist for Assessing Physical Functioning, Nutrition and Cognitive Status in a Community-Dwelling Older Japanese Cohort

Jun Hirose, Takehiro Nagata, Miki Ogushi, Nobukazu Okamoto, Takuya Taniwaki, Kiyoshi Oka, Wakana Togami-Tomiguchi, Hiroaki Koga, Kunio Hayashi, Koichiro Usuku, Hiroshi Mizuta

Background: Kihon Checklist is a self-reported comprehensive health checklist used as a screening tool to identify frailty. The Kihon Checklist is a 25-item questionnaire including seven categories: daily life, physical ability, nutrition, oral condition, the extent to which one is housebound, cognitive status, and depression risk. We aimed to clarify the consistency in assessments of three important categories: physical strength, nutritional status, and cognitive function of Kihon Checklist using assessments of actual physical, nutritional, and cognitive statuses.

Methods: The study sample consisted of 5341 elderly individuals aged ≥ 65 years who participated in the Japanese Long-Term Care Prevention Project. We evaluated the Kihon Checklist scores except the depression risk. Physical functioning was evaluated using handgrip strength, one-leg standing-balance time, the Timed Up & Go test, and a walking test at usual or maximum speed. Nutritional status was assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment questionnaire. Cognitive functioning was evaluated using Sweet 16. Associations between each category of Kihon Checklist and physical, nutritional, and cognitive functioning assessments were analyzed.

Results: There were significant differences in all categories of Kihon Checklist between participants with and without functional decline in physical, nutritional, and cognitive functioning. Multivariate analyses showed that the Kihon Checklist physical strength category correlated with physical functioning assessments, the Kihon Checklist nutritional status category correlated with the Mini Nutritional Assessment, and the Kihon Checklist physical strength category correlated with the Sweet 16 scores. Moreover, the analysis of receiver operating characteristic curve exhibited a moderately accurate relationship of the Kihon Checklist physical strength category with overall physical functioning assessments.

Conclusions: We found significant associations of the Kihon Checklist physical strength, nutritional status, and cognition categories, with assessments of physical, nutritional, and cognitive functioning, respectively. Especially, the Kihon Checklist physical strength category is a valid tool for predicting physical functioning for general frailty aspects in older adults.