我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • 学术钥匙
  • 安全点亮
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • ICMJE
分享此页面

抽象的

What Resources, Toys, Appliances and Print Materials Would Parents of Autistic Children find on The Internet, in Libraries and Shops, and how many are Evidence-Based?

Roger E Thomas and Glenda Maru

Background: The 2005-2006 US National Survey of Children With Special Health Care Needs found children with autism were less likely to receive specific health care, family support services or prompt family–centred care. Parents report more stress if their child has more severe symptoms but stress levels are lower if they find helpful readily available support. Objectives: We wished to identify the types and costs of resources parents of children with autism could find if they searched, and how many are evidence-based. Methodology: We searched for web-based or printed materials, computer applications and programs, videos, CDs and toys and visited children’s stores. We checked whether resources corresponded to the NICE 2013 systematic review on autism recommendations. Results: We identified 27 websites, 10 videos, 188 books, five occupational or play therapy programs and 78 computer applications/games. Only three websites provided information about interventions tested by an RCT: one for Picture Exchange Therapy (PECS) and two for Treatment and Education of Autistic and Related Communication Handicapped Children (TEACCH), and two books that described TEACCH. Parents would not be able to use these resources as PECS is a training program for autism teachers and TEACCH is a training program for parents taught by autism therapists. No website used evidence-based assessment tools to assess biases in design, execution and data-analysis of the resources they advocated. Many contained advertisements to purchase books or other resources they had not assessed. The US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website reports on autism prevalence rates are evidence-based but the remainder of its website is not. Conclusions: Parents could use much time reading websites and spending money purchasing books and videos that are not evidence based. Parents need guidance from professionals who are up to date with systematic reviews of evidence-based literature, such as the NICE systematic review.