国际标准期刊号: 2375-4338

水稻研究:开放获取

开放获取

我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

索引于
  • 哥白尼索引
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • 学术钥匙
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-世界猫
  • 学者指导
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 欧洲酒吧
分享此页面

抽象的

Resource Use, Profitability and Externality in Aerobic Vis-A-Vis Conventional Rice Cultivation in Karnataka, India

Thejaswi Kumar

The study was undertaken to analyze resource use, economics of cultivation and externality associated with Aerobic Rice
Cultivation (ARC) in comparison with Conventional Rice Cultivation (CRC) in Eastern Dry Zone of Karnataka. Snow ball sampling
technique was adopted to collect primary data from 50 farmers each practicing ARC and CRC. The per hectare gross returns
was higher in CRC (₹ 1,16,827/ha) compared to aerobic rice cultivation (₹ 1,00,664/ha) since the grain yield was higher in CRC.
The aerobic rice cultivation (ARC) was profitable as it generated higher net returns (₹ 24,653/ha) compared to conventional
paddy cultivation (₹ 11,046/ha) because of lower cost of cultivation. ARC was sustainable compared to conventional method
as resources were optimally used. In addition, ARC resulted in positive externality to the tune of ₹ 7714 per hectare over CRC.
Human work was the significant expense part in both ARC and CRC Among the costs in ARC, human labour cost accounted
nearly 40 per cent because of high labour requirement for weeding. Imputed irrigation cost was higher in CRC than ARC where
water requirement was saved up to 63 per cent. The examination uncovered the predominance of ARC over CRC with regards
to cost, net returns and positive externality. Hence, the study helps policy makers and stakeholders in extensive promotion of the
technology.