我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

抽象的

Review: Comparative Analysis of Nutrition Therapy and Dietary Recommendations

Robin Hood

Rather than receiving individualized nutrition therapy (INT), which is provided by a dietitian, many patients with type 2 diabetes receive dietary advice from nurses or doctors, despite recommendations to the contrary. We played out a meta-examination to look at the impact of INT that is furnished by an enlisted dietitian with the impact of dietary guidance that is given by other medical services experts. During this time, guidelines, reviews, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the outcomes gyrated hemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, body mass index, and LDL cholesterol were the subject of a systematic review of the Cochrane library databases, EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE. The guidelines for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation were used to evaluate the evidence's quality and risk of bias. We found 5 RCTs with a total of 912 participants. In the principal year of mediation, nourishment treatment contrasted and dietary guidance was trailed by lower weight, what's more, lower LDL cholesterol. There were no longer-term data available. A portion of the included studies had a likely inclination, and hence, the nature of the proof was low or moderate. Furthermore, pooling essential and optional outcomes was vital.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证。