我们集团组织了 3000 多个全球系列会议 每年在美国、欧洲和美国举办的活动亚洲得到 1000 多个科学协会的支持 并出版了 700+ 开放获取期刊包含超过50000名知名人士、知名科学家担任编委会成员。

开放获取期刊获得更多读者和引用
700 种期刊 15,000,000 名读者 每份期刊 获得 25,000 多名读者

抽象的

Vegan vs. Omnivore Diet Paradox: A Before and After Study Design Using Whole-Metagenomic Methods to Define Metabolic Networks in UltraMarathoners during the Race

Adornie Verbrughe

When faced with feeding animal items to their omnivorous dogs and carnivorous cats, people who choose not to eat animal products frequently live with animal friends. Feeding pets a food devoid of animal products—a “plantbased” or “vegan” diet—is one way to resolve this dilemma. It is unknown how many pet owners refrain from feeding their animals any animal products at this time [1, 2]. This study’s goals were to quantify the number of pet owners who avoid feeding their animals meat, pinpoint issues with traditional pet food made from animals and plants, and calculate the number of animals fed a plant-based diet. To gather information on the demographics of pet owners, their diets, the kind of pets they own, their diets, and their worries about pet foods, a questionnaire was distributed online to 3,673 English-speaking pet owners. The findings showed that, compared to the general population, pet owners were more likely to be vegetarians (6.2%; 229/3,673) or vegans (5.8%; 212/3,673). Only vegans (1.6%; 59/3,673) were the only pet owners that fed their animals a plant-based diet, with the exception of one dog owned by a vegetarian [3]. A significant fraction (45%; 269/599) of pet owners who said they were interested in feeding plantbased meals but did not currently do so wanted greater proof of the foods’ nutritional sufficiency. Concerns for the welfare of farm animals were voiced by pet owners more frequently than any other concern (39%; 1,275/3,231) [4].

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证。